Oct 30, 2009

FOIL Request

This FOIL request was written by a member of the CUNY community and was emailed to Dave Fields (CUNY Central) and Dean Koster (CUNY Law) who also received a physical copy on Thursday. As we obtain information so will the community as a whole.

October 29, 2009

CUNY School of Law
65-21 Main Street
Flushing, NY 11367

Dear ,
Pursuant to the state open records law, N.Y. Pub. Off. Law §§ 84 - 99, I write to request access to and a copy of the items listed below. Please note that where the term “record” is used, it refers to the statutory definition of that term in §86: “information kept, held, filed, produced or reproduced by, with or for an agency or the state legislature, in any physical form whatsoever including, but not limited to, reports, statements, examinations, memoranda, opinions, folders, files, books, manuals, pamphlets, forms, papers, designs, drawings, maps, photos, letters, microfilms, computer tapes or discs, rules, regulations or codes.”
1. Any request for proposal (RFP) released since 2006 by CUNY or its agents regarding a new law school building or location.
2. All letters of intent, proposals, or applications submitted to CUNY or its agents since 2006 in response to the above-referenced RFP.
3. All records concerning RFP evaluation criteria used by CUNY or its agents regarding the submissions referenced in Request #2 above.
4. All records used by CUNY, its agents, or hired consultants relating to the selection, strengths, and weaknesses of proposals and/or letters of intent received since 2006 in response to RFPs for a new law school building or location.
5. All contracts or letters of agreement between CUNY and any other entity concerning 2 Court Square, including but not limited to Memoranda of Understanding (MOU), Condominium Agreements, ownership agreements, management contracts, and other contracts relating to building services or maintenance.
6. All correspondence between CUNY and any other party concerning 2 Court Square.
7. All minutes and notes from meetings of the Board of Trustees, CUNY Central officials and staff, ad-hoc committees, and CUNY Law representatives where the RFP process and new building and/or new building location occurred since 2006.
8. All blue prints, floor plans, and pictures of 2 Court Square in the possession of CUNY, including all records that were used to determine 2 Court Square's suitability for the academic program needs and the suitability of the structure for CUNY Law’s academic program.
9. Any records in CUNYs' or its agents' possession relating to plans for renovations or expansions of 2 Court Square by CUNY or any other entity.
10. Any records pertaining to bond structure, bond financing, and bond purchasing for financing of 2 Court Square.
11. Any documents pertaining to financial projections, draft or working budgets, and funding estimates for both 2 Court Square and any other proposal or letter of intent pertaining to the RFP in Request #1.

If your agency does not maintain these public records, please let me know who does and include the proper custodian’s name and address.
I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more than $500. If the cost would be greater than this amount, please notify me. Please provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document.
As provided by the open records law, I would request your response within five (5) days.
If you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of otherwise exempt material.
Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that an unreasonable violation of the open records law can result in the award of court costs and attorney fees.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,


65-21 Main Street
Flushing, NY 11367


Read more!

Oct 15, 2009

Hiram Monserrate

One time CUNY Law student Hiram Monserrate was found guilty of misdemeanor assault and faces up to 1 year in prison. Hiram a one time New York City Police Officer and City Councilman now is a State Senator from Queens. Hiram was acquitted of two felony counts of causing serious injury. He was also acquitted of a misdemeanor charge of intending to cause physical injury. Hiram's sentencing hearing will be December 4th. He remains free on $5,000 bail. It has yet to be decided if he will be removed from office. The democrats control the senate with a two seat majority.


Read more!

The Truth?

To: The Law School Community
From: Dinesh Khosla
Date: October 14, 2009
Re: Our New Building


The Law School needs a new facility and the University has taken steps to
fulfill that need. A lot of hard work has gone into achieving that goal,
and I offer my congratulations to everyone involved in this effort. What I
say here is not intended to diminish that effort, but when I spoke with
Michelle last week and offered congratulations, I also briefly apprised her
of my concerns. I have enough respect for the Dean and this community to
express both admiration and concern. At some point during the conversation,
the Dean asked me if I was suggesting that we not proceed with the move.
Even though I was surprised and taken aback by the question, my answer was
and remains that I am happy. Let¹s proceed with this deal as long as a) a
thorough evaluation has been made as to the suitability of the building for
our program (the building was built to meet the needs of a corporate
training center, a very different thing from an educational facility); and
b) since we are spending public money, let us do it at a fair price.

I have serious concerns about the suitability of the building. Maybe this
is only because most of us have not been in it. I don¹t know how many of us
were taken to tour the building for a comprehensive evaluation, just as I
don¹t know who evaluated it for its suitability, and why individuals in the
Law School, who have knowledge and a significant level of expertise in this
area, were not included in the evaluative process. I don¹t think it is
unreasonable to ask who from the Law School and CUNY Central did the
evaluation, what were their qualifications, and what criteria they used. (I
don¹t think I saw a single memo asking for our input.)

In addition, some of my concerns relate to the price being paid, and to the
relationship between Citigroup (current owners who will retain a majority
interest in the property) and CUNY Law, which will be a minority interest
holder. However, I want to note at the outset that when negotiations are
done by a public institution with secrecy and decisions are announced, the
onus on those who wish to question becomes very heavy and time available to
do extensive research is simply not there. My research is incomplete and
some of my information is evolving. I will share it as it becomes
available. I remain open to being educated with whatever information the
administration might have or may decide to acquire before closing this deal.
Not being privy to the memorandum of understanding or a sale/purchase
agreement, it is very hard to evaluate the terms of the deal for fairness.
In writing this memo, I am relying on information in the various press
releases sent to the Law School community, my interview with an individual
who is extremely knowledgeable with the commercial real estate market in
Long Island City and New York, and my own knowledge of commercial real
estate in the tri-state area.

Last week I had a very extensive conversation with a senior vice president
at CB Richard Ellis, a leading expert in the office building market in Long
Island City (mentioned in the July 28, 2009 Business Section of The New York
Times with a picture of the Court Square building). He and his company were
responsible for putting together the land deal for Citigroup on which the 2
Court Square building stands. The land was purchased for approximately 18
million dollars with permission to build an approximately 2 million sq. ft.
(see p. 93 of New York Construction 6/2006) building (only 526,000 sq. ft.
were built and whenever Citigroup wishes to build more they can). Eighteen
million dollars paid for land divided by 2 million sq. ft. permitted to be
built gives us a land value of $9.00 per sq. ft. of buildable space.
According to the executive at CB Richard Ellis, 2 Court Square is a ³first
class Manhattan building² in Long Island City which was built at a total
cost of $250-$275 per sq. ft. Even assuming $275 per sq. ft. and adding
$9.00 per sq. ft. for land, the value of the building is not in excess of
$300 per sq. ft. (In comparison, first class buildings in Manhattan are
selling between $350-$400 per sq. ft. (See Commercial Observer, Oct. 6,
2009.) A landmark building of 1.4 million sq. ft. owned by AIG sold for
$140 million this year at a mere $106 per sq. ft. (See Wall Street
Journal‹Deal Journal blogs.WSJ.com/deals.) I am fully aware that a first
class, totally custom-built building, taking into account the Law School¹s
academic program and its current and future needs, using the most expensive
materials (for example, mahogany panels in moot court room, etc.) can be
built for $500-$700 per sq. ft. This building is not custom-built for us,
and we need a professional evaluation as to what the cost will be of
retrofitting the building to meet our program needs. We all know that in
most cases it is cheaper to build than to renovate. We should also keep in
mind that the first floor (approximately 16% of total space) is unfinished
and will cost us an additional sum of money, depending on what its final use
and configuration is. I have heard that 15 to 19 million dollars will be
made available to finish the first floor and retrofit the rest of the
building.

I have serious doubts about whether any serious negotiations regarding the
price of this building were conducted. I think it¹s important that the
memos exchanged between the negotiators, as well as the minutes of any and
all meetings relating to negotiations, be made public. Transparency creates
trust. Who negotiated on our behalf and what are their qualifications? We
as a community need to know everything that transpired during negotiations
so that we can make independent assessments of the deal. We need to realize
that if Citigroup decides to build the remaining allowed 2 million sq. ft.,
we will be only 8.88% owners of the condominium interest.

Dean Anderson told me that we are paying $155 million, inclusive of
furnishings, for 225,000 sq. ft. (42.77% ownership interest). That
translates to $688.88 per sq. ft. I do not know the value of furnishing, in
particularly their depreciated value. (Even if they are unused, they have
depreciated and may or may not be to our liking.) Dean Anderson also told
me that according to her information, Citigroup¹s total cost was 300 million
dollars for the entire project. (Her information seems to be in line with
the $290 million reported in a New York Construction article of 6/2006.)
According to my initial research, Citigroup started to put this deal
together in 1986, shelved it in 1989 when the city experienced a real estate
bust, and then decided in the last several years to resurrect it. And the
building has been partially vacant since they completed it. (From an
investment perspective, vacancy acts as a drag on value.) One simple
principle of markets is that the price of an asset is determined by what
markets dictate, not by what anyone paid for or spent in building that
asset. In my humble opinion, the price we are paying is beyond reason. We
should not be spending public money to cover the mistakes of the likes of
Citigroup. We should proceed with the acquisition but only pay what the
free market determines to be the fair value.

My calculations suggest that ownership of 225,000 sq. ft. in a 526,000 sq.
ft. building gives the Law School a minority condominium interest of
approximately 42.77%. If this is the case, a whole range of questions needs
to be considered as the deal is structured.

(a) How is the management relationship between the majority/minority
stakeholder structured? How are issues such as development of air rights,
and who the other future condo owners might be, going to be decided? Is it
by a simple majority of votes or by a super majority (67% of the vote)? I
would strongly suggest that a super majority decision be required in all
situations that have a potential of affecting the character, use and image
of the building.

(b) Usually the condo association manages the building. This includes
making all decisions relating to custodial and maintenance staff. What
happens to the custodial and maintenance staff currently employed by the Law
School? I hope as we move forward, we don¹t leave behind the people working
here, maybe leave them without jobs.

(c) I understand that the developers of this project received substantial
incentives and tax credits. Have they been factored in, in the process of
negotiating the price of this minority interest?

(d) The Law School is a not-for-profit educational entity, not subject to
property taxes. The building currently owned by a for-profit entity pays
property taxes. Has a provision in the sale purchase agreement been made to
account for the reduction of taxes? I suggest that 100% benefit of the
reduction of taxes flow to the Law School.

(e) Is there a provision in the sale purchase agreement which gives the
Law School/or CUNY Central first option to buy the remaining condo interest?
If not, that should be included in the agreement.

(f) I would urge the administration to have a sustained and structured
dialogue with individuals who currently work here to understand and try to
mitigate the impact of relocation in their lives.

In closing, I wish to emphasize that I write this memo with the same spirit
with which I helped build this institution since its inception. I do not
wish to disrupt. I only wish to make sure that the building is suitable for
the current and future needs of our program and that we pay a fair market
value for the asset we are about to buy. We need to be sure that we not
participate (inadvertently) in a process which ends up paying for the
mistakes of organizations like Citigroup which has participated in the
biggest mortgage scam ever in history against the lower and middle economic
strata of our population.

An After Thought

(a) For 23 years, starting in 1986, the City of New York gave millions of
dollars in tax incentives to Citibank (now Citigroup) to move to Long Island
City so that the benefits of jobs and prosperity could spread to blighted
areas. Even though Citigroup began the process of land acquisition, it did
not move. It finally built its first tower several years ago‹sold it to SL
Green Real Estate Investment Trust and leased it back for some of its
offices. (Our 2 Court Square was built a couple of years ago to house up to
1800 employees and with the exception of 4/5 floors sits vacant.)

(b) Between last year and this year the Bush and Obama Administrations
bailed out Citigroup with billions of our dollars. ³Citigroup was too big to
fail,² we were told. ³We have to save them no matter what the cost to us
and future generations.²

(c) Now the Empire State of New York is bailing them out again by agreeing
to pay this excessive price.

The great unspoken truth might be that we are buying again and again the
same asset, which in equity we already own! What a distortion of market
economy in favor of rich, inefficient corporate masters! Let us make sure
that CUNY Law remains true to its mission‹to serve the underserved. That
surely has never been Citigroup¹s ambition.


Read more!

Sep 29, 2009

New Building

The School is getting a new home in Queens at 2 Court Square in Long Island City.

The Board of Trustees approved the law school's relocation today. The new building is Leed Gold Certified and gives the school 69,000 additional square feet of space.

The law school will have a condominium interest in the first 6 floors of a 14 story building. The remaining floors will continue to be owned by Citigroup. The move will enable CUNY to offer a new, part-time program, and situate it within walking distance of numerous city subway and bus lines, the Long Island Rail Road, and the New York State Supreme Court building in Long Island City.

CUNY says the new site will be ready in time for the start of Fall 2011 classes.


Read more!

New Building

B. THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK – CUNY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION:
RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees hereby authorize the incorporation of a New York not-for-profit corporation
to be named the “CUNY Real Estate Development Corporation” or such other name using the word “CUNY” as may
be approved by the New York Department of State (the “Corporation”); and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Corporation is formed for the purpose of qualifying to issue bonds on behalf of The City
University of New York (“CUNY”) and as such, its purposes shall be:
“to acquire, develop, renovate, equip, and lease to CUNY, the City University Construction Fund, or a
CUNY affiliate organization, property located in the City of New York, New York, at which CUNY will
operate its law school program (the “Project”); and to issue bonds on behalf of CUNY to finance the
acquisition, development, renovation, and equipping of the Project and to repay such bonds solely with
monies paid to the Corporation as rent for the Project”; and it is further
RESOLVED, That CUNY, acting through its Senior Vice Chancellor for Legal Affairs, shall serve as the sole corporate
member of the Corporation; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the following shall serve as the initial Board of Directors of the Corporation, to serve until their
successors are elected and qualified: Allan Dobrin, Frederick Schaffer, Iris Weinshall; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Corporation shall apply for recognition as a charitable corporation under Code Section
501(c)(3) and as a public charity, supporting organization, under Code Section 509(a)(3); and be it further
RESOLVED, That CUNY shall require the Corporation to provide quarterly reports to CUNY’s Board of Trustees that
shall include a summary of the Corporation’s activities; and be it further
RESOLVED, That CUNY shall have access to the Corporation’s Board meeting minutes as well as all financial
information compiled and maintained by the Corporation; and be it further
RESOLVED, That Iris Weinshall is hereby authorized to execute and deliver such documents necessary to effectuate
the foregoing resolutions.


Read more!

Sep 21, 2009

Comments

1) I know many of you are unhappy with the inability to write comments on posts. This is in reaction to many of the erroneous things that were being said about the community, faculty and staff members. As the comments were doing more damage than good the comments have to go until the blog figures out another course of action. Thank you for reading.

2) The rumors at CUNY are indicating that the new building will be a renovation of a pre-existing building. It also appears that the bonds will be sold to individuals and/or entities that really have nothing to do with the mission of the school. But we at the blog hope this is not true. However, it appears that the non-profit entity is entirely separate from the school and hopefully with a careful screening process in admissions the mission can stay intact for a few more years. But there is no doubt that rich people will be making money off of this building project.

3) We are waiting patiently for the data about the incoming class. It appears that CUNY may not be the most diverse law school in the country anymore.


Read more!

Sep 16, 2009

Blog Not Dead

To the community who reads the blog,
CUNY Law has many problems, some that are new and developing and others that have evolved over time. Though the intentions of this blog were predominately good, its effects have caused multiple problems within the CUNY community that have been disastrous. The reason that there has not been posts is because we at the Blog have been trying to figure out a way to use the blog as a productive tool without the negative side effects. Many ideas have been floated but until recently a vast majority of them would continue to do damage to a dwindling sense of community. As we are close to working out the kinks you can expect new posts soon and frequently. Welcome back from summer vacation!


P.S. A non-profit entity has been set up to sell bonds to raise money for the new school building. More to come!


Read more!

Sep 15, 2009

Thank you CUNY Law!

As the blog has been fairly dead this school year, some members of the Class of 2009 would like to extend our thanks to the faculty, staff, and administration of CUNY Law for providing several members of our class with employment during this tough economic time. Between professors finding research assistant positions for members of the class of 2009 and the introduction of the CLRN LaunchPad program (described below), a number of students can pay their rent for a few more months.

We know that it must have taken some serious work to find money for these programs, and we are very grateful. CUNY really came through for us again and we appreciate it.

Thank you!

The idea behind the creation of the CUNY School of Law LaunchPad for Success flows from the devastating impact that the current economic downturn has had on the legal profession. Hard hit are lawyers at almost every level of practice – from large corporate firms to public service positions and perhaps most affected, attorneys in small firms and solo practices. While many in society would not necessarily lament the plight of unemployed lawyers, CUNY Law is particularly concerned because its graduates play a huge role in fostering access to justice in New York City through their work in public service organizations like Legal Services, Legal Aid and programs dealing with issues like domestic violence, human rights, elder law, immigration, landlord/tenant and criminal defense. In the arena of private practice, CLRN has been in the national forefront of programming designed to support lawyers working in solo and small firm practices located in legally underserved communities throughout New York City. At a time when access to justice is at an all-time low, a further decrease in the corps of attorneys who assist New Yorkers with unmet legal needs will further exacerbate the already critical access to justice situation. The time is now to support community-based lawyers, ready, willing and able to serve New Yorkers of modest means. With so few employment opportunities available for members of CUNY Law’s Class of 2009, we are looking for ways to harness the talents of recent graduates without job prospects, simultaneously doing our part to respond to the justice gap. The CUNY Law LaunchPad for Success is designed to train our graduates between the time they take the New York State Bar Exam in July 2009 until they receive the results of the exam at the end of November 2009. During this interim period, we intend to train graduates in the practical implementation of the law in areas such as immigration and landlord/tenant, and pay them to provide paraprofessional services in a myriad of justice initiatives for which CLRN receives New York State and City Council funding. Experiences gained in the LaunchPad will enable participants to effectively transition into jobs that become available as the economy improves or into private practice.


Read more!

Jul 20, 2009

Best public interest law schools

http://www.nationaljurist.com/content/best-public-interest-law-schools

Best public interest law schools

More now than ever, students want to do public interest work. We explore how the field has changed over the years and who’s at the top of their game.

By Michelle Weyenberg

“We’re not grooming you to be Wall Street lawyers,” said Elena Kagan, dean of Harvard Law School, after being awarded the 2008 John R. Kramer Outstanding Law Dean Award from Equal Justice Works in August. “We’re grooming you to change the world.”

Today, more students want to work in the public interest field than in the last 15 years. By the time these students are getting to law school, many are already infected with the “public interest bug,” said David Stern, chief executive officer for Equal Justice Works.

Frankly, word has gotten back to students that lawyers are unhappy in private practice. These students want to have a rewarding, balanced life and make a difference on pressing problems.

Like others in the field today, Stern is a self-described diehard public interest type.

“I knew I was going to pursue public service with my law degree,” he said. “Even so, while in law school I felt the pressure of the private sector, especially with law firms recruiting on campus. In contrast, finding and securing a public interest job was a lot of work.”

The stereotype of someone working in public interest law16 years ago was that the person couldn’t cut it at the big firm, Stern said. Today, the competition for public interest jobs is fierce, and those who win prestigious public interest fellowships are singled out and celebrated for their achievements.

“We celebrate those who are choosing public interest work,” he said. “A change in the profession is seeing the caliber of people who want to go into this area.”

While exploring how law schools have gotten better at improving public interest law programs, we’ll examine what resources are available to students, the current trends and the top schools for public interest law.

Who’s ahead of the game?

Northeastern University School of Law took the top spot with their guaranteed clinical opportunity and public service graduation rate, among others.

Dean Emily Spieler said the core difference between her school and others is that they believe every student who enters law school should learn about law and society.

“Our approach has more to do with core values,” she said. “I think it’s extremely attractive to students interested in law school. And it’s incredibly supportive for students deciding that’s what they want to do post-graduate.”

Approximately 88.7 percent of Northeastern’s 2006 graduating class completed at least one field placement, compared to most law schools, who are in the 30 to 60 percent range.

And though Northeastern’s law school tuition is comparably higher than others, approximately 78 percent of students received scholarships and grants.

“What we’re very proud of is everyone graduates understanding what is going on,” Spieler said.

To compile the rankings of Best Law Schools for Public Interest Law, preLaw Magazine used a scoring system based on a 100-point scale to assign point values to law schools in three equally weighted categories — student involvement, curriculum and financial factors.

The categories reflected the same areas that Equal Justice Works recommends students consider when investigating law schools. The National Jurist listing was compiled independently by staff editors and did not reflect the views of Equal Justice Works.

Those in our Top 10 excel in many areas, including the strength of the clinical programs and loan assistance programs, pro bono requirements and the percentage of graduates entering the field.

The student involvement category assigned points for student activity and percentage of graduates of the Class of 2006 who entered jobs in the public interest field (defined as jobs in legal services, nonprofit organizations and public defender offices, but not including government jobs or judicial clerkships generally.)

The curriculum category assigned points for the existence of a public interest coordinator, strength of clinical programs, and existence of a voluntary or mandatory pro bono graduation requirement.

The financial factors category assigned points for cost of tuition, availability of grants and scholarships and strength of loan repayment or loan assistance programs.

Other law schools making our top 10 list include Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, Lewis and Clark College of Law, American University Washington College of Law, Stanford University, Mercer University, University of Maryland, University of Washington School of Law, University of North Carolina and the City University of New York School of Law.

CUNY Dean Michelle Anderson said overall, the vast majority of law school graduates do not go into public interest practice.

“At CUNY we have more students going into public interest law percentage-wise,” she said. “Our moto at the law school is ‘Law in the Service of Human Needs.’”

Improving public interest law

Anderson said CUNY’s curriculum focus is dedicated to public interest law — hiring professors who work in the public interest field and admitting students based on demonstrated experience in the field.

“We really are and were pioneers when we were founded in 1983,” she said. “This was a law school that was to be devoted to public interest. We have been praised for our integration of theory and practice.”

Heather Jarvis, senior program manager for Equal Justice Works, said the new trend in legal education is to incorporate skills training and allow more choices for hands-on experiences and opportunities.

“More schools are requiring pro bono service or are offering public interest certificates,” she said. “Equal Justice Works believes that students should have at least one hands-on service experience while in law school.

“You will find that incorporating public interest into the law school experience is an emphasis of law schools these days,”
Jarvis said.

For more than 20 years, Equal Justice Works has collaborated with the nation’s leading law schools, law firms, corporate legal departments and nonprofit organizations to provide the training and skills that enable attorneys to provide effective representation to vulnerable populations.

Equal Justice Works provides a continuum of programs that begin with incoming law school students and extend into later careers in the profession.

Stern said their focus was initially on the diehards, but over time they changed the focus to look more at the 100-percent solution. Which is, every student should graduate with a commitment to serving under-served communities and causes. Those values are often instilled through summer jobs, pro bono opportunities or clinical programs.

“Personal experiences where students use their skills to help a needy individual or community lead to lifelong commitments of the work,” he said. “We hope to create a profession where every lawyer gives time, talent and money to take on the justice deficit.”

Spieler said Northeastern’s first-year program has every law student working on a community-based legal research project for a real client organization. This, she says, gives students the legal skills and social context of the public interest field.

New trends in the field

In recent years, there has been a dramatic shift in law school leadership. A transfer over to a new generation of deans who care deeply about the field has already begun. These are people who really prioritize public interest programming by revamping the programs to better serve students.

“There is no substitute for leadership in this field,” Stern said.

But some students become discouraged just as they begin law school. And it could be said that first impressions really do matter.

“This woman said to me, ‘I started law school because I was interested in justice and quit after two months because no one talks about justice,’” Spieler said of a conversation she had with a woman on a flight.

Northeastern, she adds, has always attracted students that have wanted to have that conversation.

“I have always believed that the majority of people that come to law school are interested in thinking and talking about justice,” she said. “Traditionally law schools have failed to support that interest in a variety of ways. It’s one of the reasons we’re so successful.”

But the bad trends cannot be overlooked. Stern said law school rankings have a really pernicious effect on the way law schools spend their money. Those rankings do not measure what goes on inside the institution and the quality of education, he added.

“I see how these law schools are so beholden to the criteria used in the rankings,” he said. “It’s just unfortunately a cycle. In my view, applicants should go in and look for qualities that matter to them.”

Anderson said those in the field dedicate themselves to the disenfranchised people in the world who desperately need the service of lawyers.

“I think it’s a moral obligation for a lawyer to at least engage in pro bono practice,” she said. “So it’s heartening to see that schools are increasingly attending to the needs of students to try and engage in public interest practice.”

“But the need in the world is much greater than what law schools are producing today,” she added. “So we have much further to go as legal academy to try and service the real needs of the poor and disempowered in the world.”

Financial assistance improves

Spieler said the biggest challenge continues — law school is very expensive and many of the public sector and public interest job salaries have simply not kept up. Now people with this passion have to confront the fact that they have to figure out how to pay off loan debt.

“That’s really a core challenge at this point,” Spieler said. “When I went to law school you could graduate with debt and work it off, and now it’s difficult for students to do.”

But a major law school development has been the increase in Loan Repayment Assistance Programs.

Spieler said Northeastern is dedicated to strengthening its loan repayment program, which began in 1994. The law school now provides half a million dollars a year in support to students.

Many other law schools have beefed up their LRAP budgets. They vary in generosity and terms included, but it’s been an area of significant growth.

There is also that sense of isolation. Now a significant amount of law school groups raise money by conducting auctions and tithing programs.

Stern said the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 was a terrific and surprise development.

And in August, the Higher Education Reauthorization and College Opportunity Act of 2008 was signed. It establishes four new loan forgiveness and repayment programs that benefit public interest lawyers. They are:

• The John R. Justice Prosecutors and Defenders Incentive Act — providing $10,000 per year in exchange for a one time renewable three-year commitment for state and local prosecutors and public defenders.

• The Legal Assistance Loan Repayment Program — providing $6,000 per year in renewable three-year commitments to a maximum of $40,000 for civil legal assistance lawyers.

• Loan Forgiveness for Service in Areas of National Need — providing no more than $2,000 per year for five years for Public Sector Employees, including public interest legal services.

• Perkins Loan Cancellation for Public Service — providing partial loan cancellation for persons in specified public service jobs including federal public defenders.

Looking ahead

There are essential components to the success of public interest law programs, Spieler said. The first is student support in the financial sense, scholarships, loan repayment and stipends.

“Continuing to build our domestic and international relationships, starting new programs and managing curriculum and faculty recruitment are things that are constantly in review,” she said.

A major trend 15 years ago was that public interest support came mainly from career services offices. Now there are public interest advisors and independent offices and programs.

“If law school students speak loudly enough, deans will listen,” Stern said. “There is nothing like one school having [a great program], because it often inspires a peer school to have it too.”

Michelle Weyenberg is Associate Managing Editor for preLaw magazine and The National Jurist.

Best law schools for Public Interest Law

To compile the rankings of Best Law Schools for Public Interest Law, The National Jurist used a scoring system based on a 100-point scale to assign point values to law schools in three equally weighted categories — student involvement, curriculum and financial factors. The categories reflected the same areas that Equal Justice Works recommends that students consider when investigating law schools. Information gathered from The E-Guide to Public Service at America's Law Schools: 2007-2008 Edition. The National Jurist listing was compiled independently by staff editors and did not reflect the views of Equal Justice Works.



1


Northeastern University School of Law


2


Loyola Law School in Los Angeles


3


Lewis and Clark College of Law


4


American University Washington College of Law


5


Stanford Law School


6


Mercer University School of Law


7


University of Maryland School of Law


8


University of Washington School of Law


9


University of North Carolina School of Law


10


City University of New York School of Law


11


Hofstra University School of Law


12


William Mitchell College of Law


13


University of Iowa College of Law


14


University of Baltimore School of Law


15


New York Law School


16


Seattle University School of Law


17


Temple University Law School


18


Albany Law School


19


Georgetown University Law School


20


Villanova University School of Law


21


William S. Boyd School of Law at UNLV


22


Gonzaga University School of Law


23


Loyola University-Chicago School of Law


24


University of Arizona College of Law


25


Roger Williams University School of Law


26


Seton Hall University School of Law


27


Whittier Law School


28


University of Colorado Law School


29


University of California Davis School of Law


30


Rutgers University-Newark School of Law


31


Indiana University-Bloomington School of Law


32


University of Oregon School of Law


33


Brigham Young Unversity J. Reuban Clark Law School


34


UCLA School of Law


35


University of California-Hastings College of Law


36


Hamline University Law School


37


Quinnipiac University School of Law


38


University of Idaho College of Law


39


Golden Gate University School of Law


40


University of Denver College of Law


41


West Virginia University College of Law


42


University of Akron School of Law


43


Arizona State University College of Law


44


University of Houston Law Center


45


Chicago-Kent College of Law


46


Drake University Law School


47


Syracuse University Law School


48


University of New Mexico School of Law


49


Cleveland-Marshall College of Law


50


Fordham University School of Law


51


Santa Clara University School of Law


52


University of Pennsylvania Law School


53


Southern Illinois University School of Law


54


Suffolk University Law School


55


Loyola University-New Orleans College of Law


56


Pepperdine University School of Law


57


Tulane University Law School


58


Emory University School of Law


59


Vanderbilt University Law School


60


University of Kansas School of Law


61


Oklahoma City University School of Law


62


Stetson University College of Law


63


North Carolina Central University School of Law


64


University of Texas-Austin School of Law


65


University of San Diego School of Law


66


University of Nebraska College of Law


67


Duke University School of Law


68


UDC David A. Clarke School of Law


69


Vermont Law School


70


University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law


71


Harvard Law School


72


New England School of Law


73


University of Miami School of Law


74


Marquette University Law School


75


Washington and Lee University School of Law


Read more!

Jul 17, 2009

Bar Mnemonic Thread

This came up as a thread on my Facebook page, and I thought it would be good to share with the community at large now that we're in brute force mode. Add your silly bar mnemonics!

(Pieper's got nothin' on me!)

Credit to everyone that came up with these:

Slander per se categories: [Gay CLUB]
-imputation of homosexuality (NY),
-Crime of moral turpitude,
-Loathsome disease,
-Unchastity of a woman,
-Business/profession

Impeachment methods: ["PBS Runs Crappy British Comedies"]
(prior inconsistent statement, bias, sensory deficiency, rep./opinion of bad character for veracity, criminal convictions, bad acts, contradiction)


Duties of loyalty: "Cross My Fucking Heart."
(Conscienciousness, morality, fairness, and honesty)

Provisonal Remedies: [ON TAP]
Order for seizure of chattel, Notice of pendency, Temporary receivership, Attachment, Preliminary Injunction.

adverse pos.: DOUCHE (cuz that is who would take someones land like that)

Exceptions to the equitable conversion risk of loss rule:
F-fault
U-uniform vendor vendee act
C-no marketable title at Closing
K-K subjecto a condition


Good luck, and back to the books!


Read more!

Jul 5, 2009

Less than one month to go...

With mere weeks before the bar exam, it's a good time for a thread about all things bar exam-related: stress, anxiety, tips for studying and/or maintaining sanity, anything.

Hopefully alumni who have taken the exam can answer the burning questions of the July 2009 bar examinees (like: what if I need to pee, and can I bring my lunch so I don't have to stand on line at the hot dog cart at the Javits Center). It might also be helpful for people who passed the NY bar exam to share their tips for studying during those last two weeks after the commercial courses are over.

Good luck, class of 2009!



Read more!

May 11, 2009

Margie's Table Deadbeats Ruining it for Everyone

Here's a scandal for you, CUNY.

For the first year ever, there are significant handful of people with outstanding debts to Margie's breakfast table despite her repeated entreaties, despite the email that went out to the entire student body saying that the "special book" was closed as of April 14, and despite the fact that we're supposed to be grown-ass adults who know to pay back our debts. Most surprisingly, she reports that the majority of the deadbeats are 3Ls. For shame! For anyone feeling above the law, Charles Johnson assures us that this will go down on your permanent record (i.e. character and fitness). You don't want to be the jerk who ripped off the sweet granny with the coffee, do you? DO YOU?

It doesn't matter whether you can't stand Chock Full o' Nuts coffee or the weird fish sandwiches provided by the lunch vendor, there's just no denying that Margie and Karen bust their humps to keep us fed for next-to-nothing salaries. The "special book" is a service which they don't have to provide, and which rumor has it certain associate deans have always wanted to nix. It would seem that this is the perfect opportunity to put the kibosh on a service that I know has kept me fed and caffeinated on many, many occasions. Don't fuck it up for the rest of us! Just pay your $2.50 and move on...

So in the spirit of presuming people innocent until proven guilty, please check in to make sure your account is settled. They are gone, daddy, gone after Thursday morning, but really -- is there any excuse for waiting that long?


Read more!

May 5, 2009

Cheating

What are people's thoughts about what to do in a situation where you have reason to believe that a classmate is about to cheat on say, a closed-book in-class exam? (in no way is this question meant to imply that there is cuny-wide issue with cheating.)

The academic integrity policy on pages 16-19 of the handbook are of little guidance in this area. There does not seem to be a duty to report but should we? There can be some severe consequences but only after a fact-finding process.

Stay out of it?
Don't stress yourself before taking the exam?
Report?
Confront?
Something else?


Read more!

Apr 30, 2009

Hostos Community College - New President

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/bronx/2009/04/29/2009-04-29_matos_rodriguez_tapped_as_new_hostos_president.html

Matos Rodríguez tapped as new Hostos Community College president

BY Tanyanika Samuels
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Wednesday, April 29th 2009, 7:13 AM
Hostos Community College Presidential candidate Felix Matos Rodriguez.

Hostos Community College Presidential candidate Felix Matos Rodriguez.

Hostos Community College has a new president.

The City University Board of Trustees announced Tuesday they have selected Félix Matos Rodríguez to head the community college.

"It is a great honor to be part of the Hostos family," Matos Rodríguez, 47, told the Daily News. "Knowing the important history and contributions that Hostos has made to the city and the South Bronx, it will make it easy to wake up every day with energy and enthusiasm to do this job."

He starts the job on July 1.

Matos Rodríguez "brings to this critical leadership position a truly exceptional combination of scholarship, academic achievement and administrative skill, along with tremendous energy and talent," CUNY Chancellor Matthew Goldstein said.

Matos Rodríguez was among three finalists in a nationwide search to replace President Dolores Fernández, who announced her retirement last summer as head of the bilingual college. About 5,100 students attend its six-building campus on 149th St. and the Grand Concourse.

President since 1998, Fernández is credited with increasing faculty and student enrollment and new educational programs.

Matos Rodríguez said he is eager to build on her legacy, planning to meet in the coming months with Hostos and CUNY leadership to help create an agenda.

"This is an opportunity to get a better sense of the faculty, the students, the administration and alumni," he said. "I want to know what they think has been working well so we can maintain and expand that, and get a sense of where we need to change direction and refocus."

Matos Rodríguez said he is particularly interested in creating partnerships with community groups and local elected officials to help weather the economic crisis. He also hopes to build on successes in improving graduation and retention rates.

"At the end of the day, I want to be able to keep the promise the institution makes to students, which is, if you come here, we will give you a good education and help you attain your dreams."

A graduate of Yale University, Matos Rodríguez earned a doctorate degree in history from Columbia University. He has taught at Yale, Northeastern University, Boston College, Universidad Interamericana in San Juan and the City University.

He is the former secretary of the Department of the Family for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a cabinet-level post.

He, his wife, Liliana, and sons, Lucas, 7, and Juan Carlos, 5 - who were born in the Bronx - plan to move back from Puerto Rico after he completes his stint as a visiting professor there.

tsamuels@nydailynews.com


Read more!

Apr 26, 2009

Vote

We at the CUNY Law blog support an active student body. That is why we urge all students to get out and vote. It's important that students take this opportunity to voice their opinions on how they as students are represented. This year has seen an immense amount of output from student government. But next year can be better as the new constitution is in place and the expected budget is much bigger. With an active student government positive changes can be made in the community. All students can vote until Wednesday the 29th at 4pm. Students can vote in the student affairs office. Here is a list of all candidates for SG positions. Congratulations to all nominees.

2Ls
Beth Rennekamp
Rebecca Olson
Jillian Sebastian
Patrick Foster
Paula Segal
Nicholas Guarnino
John Ting
Katire Bruggeman
Ryan Ridings
Amy Hagger
Amanda Heikkinen
Suha Dabbouseh
Andrea Barrow
Marcia Emile
Michael Moskowitz
Judy Edwards-Greene
Rezwanul Islam
Ricardo Martinez
Amanda Jack
Cesar Vargas

3Ls
Bright Limm
David Eisenstein
Stephan Edel
Kathleen Meyers
Mike Rivadeneyra
Mike Leonard
Alissa Hull
Ebette Fortune
Jennifer Walner
Dustin O'Brien
Casey Bryant
Alexandra Scholl
Thaddecia Andrews
Latoya Matthew
Bronyn Heubach
Rebeka Penberg
Julia Seifer-Smith
Maryam Arif


Read more!